Open Science, open access: literature review of the scientific communication about Covid-19 on the SciELO platform (2020)

Abstract

From the perspective of Open Science by means of open access, the study analyzes the scientific communication about Covid-19, made available by the SciELO platform, until February 19, 2021. With a qualitative approach, content analysis is used for data collection and interpretation. The research is divided into two steps: the first presents the general results on publications, the journals that mostly disseminated the studies, the types of scientific communication used, the citation indexes, and the distribution of articles by thematic areas. The second step shows the aspects listed above and presents a ranking of the 50 most accessed and cited articles. Conclusions show that SciELO made 3,165 publications available, of which 2,042 are scientific articles. The 30 most productive journals are responsible for 43% of the publications. 2,296 documents are from the Health Sciences area and have been identified on 52 different topics related to Covid-19. Among the 42 most accessed and cited studies, three main axes were found: 1) Scientific protagonism: the contribution of science in the fight against Covid-19 – public actions and policies; 2) Protocols and diagnostics for health professionals and spaces; 3) Social, political, and economic issues in the pandemic.